Since 2010, "Disgruntled" has been a ning moderator and closely involved with the key players and important decisions made to promote the ZetaTalk message and provide a forum that precludes the presence of paid debunkers and distractionists whose sole purpose is to derail Nancy's credibility and support the cover-up over Planet X.
While projecting an appearance of being helpful and diligent within the moderating staff group, "Disgruntled" had secretly been collecting what few fragments of potentially controversial information he could find to be exploited against Nancy and also formulating a coordinated attack plan that would inflict the maximum damage to Nancy's credibility and the Pole Shift ning.
Like previous attacks by black ops and the establishment that have utterly failed to accomplish their objective against Nancy and the ZetaTalk message, this is simply another failed attempt and an indication of the growing desperation of the establishment. The cowardly and subversive means by which this attack was deployed is characteristic of those in the Service to Self, a signature that is unmistakable.
Those invited by myself to be moderators on this, the Earth Changes and Pole Shift ning, must be staunch individuals, willing to put in long hours as volunteers, and also able to withstand psychic attacks, as noted in the blog on Remote Viewing -
telepathic suggestions made to authors and key individuals, to undermine their efforts. My ning is a threat to the establishment, as those spreading disinformation are not allowed to ply their fare. As the Zetas have explained, for the establishment to just take down this ning would be too obvious. The chosen path, instead, is to demoralize the moderating group, set it to internal battles, and thus while the cat is away, the mice can play!
"Disgruntled" is the most recent victim of a psychic attack, having shown evidence of this for some weeks but wavering in his defense. Per the Zetas he has a weakness, his ego, and finally broke.
It should not be a shock that [Disgruntled] attacked Nancy, citing as her greatest offense that she was “rude”, and using every means at his disposal to undercut her long-standing badge of honor – ZetaTalk Accuracy. Will his claims that Nancy cannot function without the support of the logic and contributions of male members in the secret chambers of the moderator group fly? Then why has ZetaTalk accuracy been in place and standing for 17 years, when Gerard’s ning has only been in operation for a couple years? There is nothing in his long argument that would embarrass Nancy or ZetaTalk. This issue will blow past within a day, given no credence by the public who sees the accuracy of ZetaTalk and is amazed at Nancy’s ability to deal with many scientific issues.
[Disgruntled] expressed doubts on the accuracy of ZetaTalk when a false Maria was in contact with him, months after Maria disappeared into the Venezuelan jungles and had even closed her profile via Gerard as she knew it would be a vacant house inviting a takeover when she would be without internet access. Only the teeth on the false Maria proved his convictions wrong. Those seeking to influence [Disgruntled] found a weakness in him, and exploited it. Knowing this was brewing, we allowed Nancy to be confused about a “north facing” building, assuming at quick glance that this was a “north facing” cam. In that Nancy has stumbled in the past, admittedly and often on purpose, this was not a fatal mistake. We knew this would draw [Disgruntled] out.
Having been on Skype with Mariaelisa in the past, "Disgruntled" was certain it was her when “she” contacted him via Facebook. The Zetas warned that this was a takeover, but "Disgruntled" was already being influenced to doubt ZetaTalk and proceeded to do another Skype session with Maria. But the evidence showed the Zetas right, once again, as the teeth were not the same. Note in the photos that the old Maria showed her face well lit from the front. The false Maria was careful to place a light only from the left, so the alignment of her front teeth could not be discerned. But she tossed her head at one point, revealing her bite, and one can clearly see that her teeth are different. The real Maria has the left front tooth pulled back, and not descended fully. The fake Maria has the left front tooth forward, and fully descended. The real Maria has a left canine that pulls up shorter than the other front tooth. The fake does not – the canines are the same length as the front teeth.
There have been three such take-overs, attempts to discourage my moderators or membership, to date – Mariaelisa’s, another who lost internet access, and a third who had a stroke and left his persona available for a takeover. Psychically attacking key individuals has been in process for some months, as the Chris Thomas Wakefield
incident showed, instituted in mid-2011. Chris had the Lord of Karma and a blood thirsty Jesus declaring Nancy dead, at one point, such was the assault on him. If ZetaTalk accuracy does not demonstrate that it is a threat to the cover-up over the alien presence and the presence of Planet X in the inner solar system, these attacks do. Regarding any “expose” over Nancy struggling to understand ALL scientific facts, in ALL disciplines, and never growing weary or making typos or overlooking a detail, this has long been admitted. The key issue in sorting out what "Disgruntled" has recently shrilled to the world, via every means at his disposal, is whether he and others have had a hand in ZetaTalk accuracy, being the guiding light so to speak. My ning, and Nancy’s acquaintance with "Disgruntled," have only been in place since 2009, and ZetaTalk on the web making predictions that are consistently proving accurate since 1995! Where was the resentful "Disgruntled" all those years? And as a member posted on the 6/23/2012 Q&A discussion:
I've asked Nancy and the Zetas close to 100 questions on GLP. Back when anybody could ask her almost any question that they wanted, and where Nancy pointed out that she answered even the I guess dumb question so that they wouldn't accuse her of picking and choosing. (Too long ago so I can't remember the exact words). And to get such logical responses in 10 to 15 minutes or less, while not contradicting past answers from years of Zeta Talk was something that no human can do. Even when a person knows a lot about a subject, if they're not in the proper mindset they might not always be able to give a clear response, but ZT always did. I could go on and on. And live ZT on the radio, no human would be able to fake it. So many different radio show hosts, and callers, and they would all have to be in it to fake it. I even remember one time where human Nancy seemed to not be able to quite explain a point clearly, perhaps not in the proper mindset, and as soon as she gave the question to the Zetas, the point was just expressed perfect. But I did notice a couple of times where a question that I asked that where slightly personal were slightly misunderstood by Nancy and the Zetas answered them the way Nancy understood them. (Though the answers were still great) I'm sure the Zetas could completely read my thoughts. But if Nancy understanding of the question is different from what the person who asked the question intended, do the Zetas continue answering them the way Nancy perceived it?
This issue came up in 2002 and was addressed in the Stumble ZetaTalk article,
below. Nancy is a translator, and puts the Zetas concepts into English. She is not a megaphone. She is a human being, mostly exhausted. Her insistence on "being on the same page" before doing ZetaTalk on an issue is for this reason. Sometimes the Zetas deliberately allow Nancy to make a mistake, as they did on the “north facing” building vs cam issue to lure "Disgruntled" out, during the game of chess they play with those trying to bring the ZetaTalk message down.
Note: written during the Sep 7, 2002 Live ZetaTalk IRC Session.
We allowed Nancy to answer the question about the Beatles according to her understanding of the question, to demonstrate the limits of the vehicle. In fact, if she is not on the same page, understanding the setting, understanding the context of the question, she cannot put words to our concepts correctly. This is akin to a Greek translator being asked to interpret French. Hearing English, the Greek translator interprets correctly. Hearing French, almost any idea may pop into the head of the translator, and the answer following down wrong paths accordingly. It does matter what is in the translators head, such that an Aboriginal hearing an English mathematician describe the orbits of the planets would explain this to the tribe in a manner the Englishman would find absurd. Likewise, the Englishman hearing the Aboriginal describe migrations of the wildlife, and the reasons for variations, would leave the Aboriginal bent over in laughter. There are, in fact, words missing from one language, inherent in another, due to these concept synching problems.
Thus, in the past, when Nancy was asked to speak in math, and did so poorly, this demonstrated our refusal, and hers, to do this. This has for a long time been the rule, and the public forgets. Thus, choosing a silly subject, the Beatles, unimportant in the main line issues of today, we allowed this to proceed. Nancy is not a Beatle fan, never has been, and thus hears these names only in the distance on the news, in the background. She was aware of a recent death, cancer, someone who did good work around the globe and was beloved, and assumed this to be the person asked about, especially in the Context of being protected by Service-to-Other aliens due to the human's mission. We do not expect this to be believed, but for those looking for a reason for this catastrophic blooper, this is it!
Note: Below added during Nov 16, 2002 Live ZetaTalk IRC Session.
Early in ZetaTalk, there was high alarm that we, the Zetas, were out there in the world telling all, telling the truth, and gripping the public with the scope and depth of Nancy's postings that we were fast gaining international aclaim. We have stated before, that depending upon the success of ZetaTalk, as perceived by the establishement, push-back occurs. If Nancy is viewed as being perceived as accurate, believable, then a hundred times more disinfo sites and agents would be sent forth to counter this than have actually been dispatched. Thus, it is a clever maneuver, on our part, and with Nancy's cooperation, to do a Columbo, act befuddled, appear to make a slip, on occasion. These slips are carefully placed so as to placate the establishment, but not confuse the readership who is reading with broad interest, and looking at the overall trends. The establishement is in general either wealthy, used to wielding power only because of their wealth, or those in power who rely on the wealthy. Thus, for an aging woman, who has worked all her life and must work to eat on a weekly basis, to have an impact in the world is inconcievable to them
Early in the game the Hale-Bopp ploy was used, and in truth Nancy was under the impression until late in the game that there was no comet! Our words, as recorded by Nancy, however, told a different story. We relayed that Hale-Bopp in 1995, within a month after Hale-Bopp was announced, was not a comet, but a nova, and the ESO confirmed this in the Fall of 1995. After that, as JPL and NASA dotted an orbit across the sky, where no comet was tracking, to meet the plotted orbit of a real comet the NEAT program that watches dark asteroids had detected, we reported these orbit aberations. The orbit of Hale-Bopp plotted by JPL leap away from Jupiter upon passage, perturbed away, and all of this per reports by JPL of actual and recent sightings! The group wanting to have the public look in the opposite direction of Orion was placated, however, as Nancy steadfastly maintained, in NancyTalk, that there was no Hale-Bopp comet. Then in 1996, we slipped in a warning in ZetaTalk that they were lining the false/fake orbit up with the orbit of a real comet, and when this emerged in 1997, we, the Zetas, were not wrong. Nancy was a bit miffed at having been used in this manner, but the benefit soon dawned upon her.
In like manner, in the early days of Planet X sightings, we laid out trip points to placate the establishement. It was a Mag 2, and at the time when ZetaTalk was building international acclaim due to its utter accuracy on all other issues, this simple point placated NASA and the arrogant elite. And how would Nancy and ZetaTalk ever recover from this? They presumed this a fatal error. When the sightings began in early 2001, this was the cry, the Magnitude issue, and our explanations that our eyes could see it and our equipment register it as a Mag 2 deemed inadequate. However, like a giant mushroom growing in the dark, ZetaTalk grew, internationally, and in the underground of the Internet. Nancy's appearances on radio or TV or in articles were considered no more threatening than other New Age claimants, but the readership caught the truth and relevance of our words and checked into the web site.
Even Nancy's poverty level is a ploy, though real, in that the Hazlewood plot was to assocate Nancy with money scams, which she avoided by working and being broke, as she has been most of her life. The establishment was placated at their loss of taking her down in this manner because she was broke, and struggling, and none of them could immagine having an impact in the world from such a position. Now, going into the final months, the establishment will be so overwhelmed that they care not, will go into increasing isolation, into their bunkers, at least into a bunker mentality, and Nancy and ZetaTalk the least of their worries.